In response, Uber submitted an application to stay the proposed class procedure in favour of arbitration proceedings in the Netherlands, as provided for in the compromise clause in the standard form agreements that Uber had with its drivers. This clause required that all disputes between the parties be resolved through mediation and arbitration in the Netherlands. CSC did not address this issue at the heart of Mr. Heller`s class action (i.e., whether Uber drivers and other workers in similar positions in the Gig Economy are workers protected by the Labour Standards Act). However, CSC`s decision sets the conditions for a court to determine whether people in the Gig Economy, such as Uber drivers, are indeed licensees. In a statement to the Canadian lawyer, an Uber spokesperson said, “We thank the court for today`s verdict, which we will take a closer look at in the coming days. However, we may share our plans to amend our contracts in order to respect the principles of the Court. In the future, dispute resolution will be more accessible to drivers and will allow Uber Canada to move closer to other jurisdictions. We are proud to offer tens of thousands of self-employed drivers across Ontario a flexible earning opportunity. Several similar Gig Economy disputes have been resolved around the world, under different legal systems and with different contracts; “The results are generally very different,” Wright says. “Even Uber uses different arbitration agreements in different jurisdictions.” One of the problems he and his team brought to the attention of the Ontario Court of Appeal was that drivers in California could opt out of arbitration agreements and act as mediators in California, with fees paid by Uber. “So even a company can approach this issue differently in different legal systems.” Drivers are excluded from the Uber app unless they click on the acceptance of this new agreement,” he said. “This is a classic case of impitoyability,” Justices Rosalie Abella and Malcolm Rowe wrote for the majority of the court, in a decision that refused to ascertain whether the agreement was also invalid because the company had left the Ontario Employment Standards Act. Samfiru, however, is concerned that the contract could act as a deterrent to the class action he initiated in 2017 with The Ontario Uber Eats fahrer.
In Collin County, Texas, in the northeastern suburbs of Dallas, where Democrats were hoping for a blue wave on election day, Congressman Jeff Leach attacked his Democratic opponent as an “extreme anti-police zealist.” But Leach also filed a complaint with a man who spent 13 years in prison with an illegitimate sentence, and who praised the candidate`s record in Criminal Reform. “I`m a Democrat; Jeff Leach is a Republican,” said the man, Christopher Scott. “He`s a person we can`t lose in our state.” The denunciation was significant: in an election season where no one seemed to agree and Republicans tried to associate Democrats with unconsciousness, criminal law reform was the rare subject on which the two parties seemed to find common ground. Sign up for the New York Times Morning newsletterLeach, which retained its seat, one of the candidates who used the topic to challenge the political center and prove they could work in the gang. In Oklahoma City, a Republican senator and congressional challenger, Stephanie Bice, spoke of giving low-level criminals “a second chance.” In Charleston, South Carolina, Nancy Mace, another Republican who was vying for a seat in the House of Representatives, campaigned for a law she sponsored that prohibits the chaining of pregnant women during labor. Both women beat democratic incumbents in highly competitive districts. In a video in which he presented his final argument for maintaining Republican supremacy in the Senate, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky chose three topics – tax cuts, court appointments and criminal reform. McConnell, under the former president